Instructables institutes a pay for content model
Because Instructables.com has newly decided to cripple the accounts of non-paying “Pro” members,I have pulled my instructables, and replaced them with a “of this I do not approve” notice. I published under a a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License, -, and I cannot allow my content to be co-opted and put behind a pay wall. I will repost the projects here, as well as linking to PDFs where people can download the projects. Read on for more info about what is changing at instructables.com.
In a move reminiscent of CDDB, and Salon.com, Eric Wilhelm announced last month that Instructables was moving to a closed pay-only community model. The model has since been implemented, and the timer is ticking for legacy accounts. After 90 days from implementation rollover, people who do not pay for an Instructables “Pro” account will no longer be able to:
1) View entire instructables at once
2) Print out instructables in PDF
3) Have a “favorites” list of instructables.
4)View “secondary” images in instructable steps
This means that if an instructable has more than one image in a given step, you will only be able to see the first image, and thumbnails of the other images. If the author left important detail in the images, that information is lost.
Furthermore, printing an instructable is now virtually impossible. You can, if you like, print out each step separately including all the headers, sidebars, ads, footers, comments, and other fluff, but that results in a hard to read page (try it – the layout is not conducive to printing) and a sheaf of paper for a 5 step instructable.
This poses problems for authors who now have to either rework their instructables so viewers from Google (which accounts for a substantial portion of their viewership) and others can actually use it. Otherwise some important details may be lost in secondary images for a significant number of instructables viewers.
I’m afraid that Instructables, by removing basic features that are necessary to follow an instructable, is ultimately going to decline and take a lot of really great content with them.
This is such a disappointing decision by Instructables. Thanks for speaking out about it for reclaiming your content. I hope they wake up.
I totaly agree with out.
And none of the content is theirs. If it was a magazine, it would be ok.
Pretty much people are going to get angry that the site is not unusable, leave, less people will post, and new users will be like theres nothing here, why should I pay, and the site will disapear in a little bit.
Suposedly they will allow secondary images, but it still is really anoyying to have to click each step.
this would be like google making you pay to get the link for a search result-that would never work well.
This is kind of like where this place where you ask a question, and have to pay for an answer.That never worked well as people just went to forums, yahoo help and stuff.
Hopefully its still usable, otherwise it will probably be gone is a couple years, and google will make their own thing simular to this
I know this post is a little old, but this is an interesting topic. I had no idea Instructables did that. They must have changed it somewhat since this post because I haven’t had any trouble viewing any content.
It says things like you can download PDFs and see “all steps” on one page. I can already do that and I have no pro membership so maybe their description is outdated? One thing that is true is the text editor is limited – they limit how many buttons you get to work with when creating new projects. That’s pretty lame.
Yeah, since this was originally published, they changed their policy on a lot of things. There was a really huge outcry from the people who contributed content, and they realized that the bad PR was going to cost more money than the new model was going to bring in.